|
Sean Eagan
Life Member VFW NY Post 53
American Cold War Veterans, Inc.
Web: | http://americancoldwarvets.org/ |
Blog: | Cold War Veterans Blog |
Email: | Sean.Eagan@gmail.com |
Phone: | 716 720-4000 |
Network: | My Fast Pitch! Profile |
|
Web: | http://americancoldwarvets.org/ |
Blog: | Cold War Veterans Blog |
Email: | Sean.Eagan@gmail.com |
Phone: | 716 720-4000 |
Network: | My Fast Pitch! Profile |
VA’s time to resolve disability appeals shoots up, lagging department’s goals
BY CHRIS ADAMS
McClatchy Washington Bureau
February 27, 2014
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/02/27/219665/vas-time-to-resolve-disability.html
The average time for a denied claim to work its way through the cumbersome Department of Veterans Affairs appeals process shot up to more than 900 days last year, double the department’s long-term target.
After hovering between 500 and 750 days for the past decade, what the VA refers to as its “appeals resolution time” hit 923 days in fiscal 2013. That was a 37 percent jump in one year, from 675 in fiscal 2012, according to a review of the department’s annual performance report.
The department’s long-term goal is to get that figure to 400 days, although the trend over the past decade has been in the other direction.
Asked about the slowdown during a conference call to discuss the VA’s appeals system, the department said it has been reviewing the measure to see if it’s the most meaningful one to convey to veterans how long the appeals process might take. The department also said it was continuing to look for ways to make the process more efficient.
Laura Eskenazi, the official who oversees the department’s Board of Veterans’ Appeals, cautioned that the long processing “time is not at all indicative of inactivity.” She said the many layers built into the system prompt many of the delays.
The VA organized a conference call Thursday with reporters to explain its complicated, multi-layered appeals process, which begins when a veteran’s claim for disability benefits is denied in full or in part.
Disability benefits are awarded to veterans who suffer physical or mental injuries during their military service. They range from $131 a month to $2,858 a month for a single veteran.
The VA has been engaged in a very public battle to reduce its overall backlog – the number of claims awaiting an initial decision. By 2015, the department wants to get the backlog to zero. That would ensure that no claim is pending for more than 125 days. That’s the goal that has gotten the most attention from Congress, the administration and veterans groups.
Veterans who appeal their decisions go into a separate system that can extend those waits far longer.
That appeals system has evolved in layers since it was adopted after World War I. It allows veterans, survivors or their representatives to trigger a fresh review of the entire appeal at any time by submitting new evidence or information, the VA said. The Board of Veterans’ Appeals can grant, deny or – most commonly – remand the case to one of the VA’s regional offices for additional review.
According to the most recent VA performance report, published in December, the VA’s “strategic target” – essentially a long-term goal – for total appeals resolution time is 400 days; its short-term goal is 650 days.
It hasn’t hit that 650 target in the last five years, although it got close in 2010, when the average appeals time was 656 days, records show.
Jacqueline Maffucci, research director for the advocacy group Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said that the VA’s intense focus on reducing its backlog could help explain the jump in appeals processing times.
“As the VA has pushed to end the backlog, there’s been a diversion of resources from the appeals system to tackling the backlog,” she said.
###
Curt Cashour
House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
Web: | http://americancoldwarvets.org/ |
Blog: | Cold War Veterans Blog |
Email: | Sean.Eagan@gmail.com |
Phone: | 716 720-4000 |
Network: | My Fast Pitch! Profile |
Kendall Cautions Against Complacency in U.S. Tech SuperiorityBy Army Sgt. 1st Class Tyrone C. Marshall Jr. WASHINGTON, Feb. 25, 2014 - The United States has been strategically dominant since the end of the Cold War, but complacency and distractions could lead to a loss of technology superiority, the Pentagon's top acquisition official said today.
Speaking during the Defense Programs Conference here, Frank Kendall, undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, emphasized there is no guarantee the United States will remain technologically superior in future years. "Technological superiority is not assured," he said. "You have to work to keep yourself there. It isn't free. It isn't guaranteed." Coming out of the Cold War in a very dominant position may have contributed to complacency, Kendall said. "We demonstrated that dominance in the first Gulf War [and] Serbia, and when we went into Iraq and Afghanistan," he said. "It's been a long time since the end of the Cold War, and a lot of the capabilities we have are the capabilities we had at that point in time." Kendall said the United States has been "distracted" by counterinsurgency campaigns over the last 12-plus years. "So that is taking up most of our attention," he added. "So you put those two things together -- lack of focus and our lack of investments in modernization to a certain extent -- and the third ingredient, of course, is what others are doing." Technology doesn't stand still, Kendall said, adding that the United States was observed very closely during the first Gulf War. "We shocked the world [with] how low our casualties were and how quick our victory was in the first Gulf War," he said. "In terms of counting conventional forces, Saddam had a pretty significant conventional military to confront us -- particularly on the ground. And we went through it like a knife through butter in just a very, very short period of time." Demonstrating capabilities such as stealth, precision munitions and networked forces, Kendall said, the United States dominated the battlefield "in a way no one had done before." Nations such as China and Russia paid close attention to that, he added. The Pentagon's acquisition chief said the specific areas he is worried about are control of space, precision missiles such as cruise missiles, ballistic missiles and electronic warfare capabilities. "We're dominant in some areas, clearly, like stealth and high performance engines," he said. "But those are only two ingredients in what's a much more complicated picture. So as I watch all these things, I get a bit nervous." Kendall said he is focusing on the ability to sustain technological superiority over the long term -- the next 10 to 20 years. "The investments that we are making now in technology are going to give us the forces we have in the future," he said. "The forces we have now came out of investments that were made, to some extent, in the '80s and '90s, ... particularly the investment procurements. So I don't think we can be complacent about this. I think we've got to pay much closer attention to this." Kendall noted the importance of continuing to conduct research and development. "[It] is not a variable cost," he said. "R&D drives our rate of modernization. It has nothing to do with the size of the force structure. So when you cut R&D, you are cutting your ability to modernize on a certain time scale, no matter how big your force structure is." Time is critical to the process and cannot be recovered, the undersecretary said. "If you give up the lead time it takes to get a capability, you are not going to get that back," Kendall said. "I can buy back readiness -- it takes a little time to do it, but I can buy back readiness. I can increase the size of the force structure. I can only do so much to shorten the time it takes to get a new product into the field." The United States fought World War II with equipment that was in research and development before the war started, for the most part, Kendall said. "If we hadn't done that R&D, we would have had much, much less capability to fight that war," he added. "I don't want us to be a position where we haven't done the R&D necessary to support us in the next conflict." (Follow Army Sgt. 1st Class Tyrone Marshall on Twitter: @MarshallAFPS)
|
Contact Author Biographies: Frank Kenda |
Web: | http://americancoldwarvets.org/ |
Blog: | Cold War Veterans Blog |
Email: | Sean.Eagan@gmail.com |
Phone: | 716 720-4000 |
Network: | My Fast Pitch! Profile |
Web: | http://americancoldwarvets.org/ |
Blog: | Cold War Veterans Blog |
Email: | Sean.Eagan@gmail.com |
Phone: | 716 720-4000 |
Network: | My Fast Pitch! Profile |
Sean --
For months, veterans’ benefits have been under attack as a result of December's backroom budget deal that tried to reduce the pensions of military retirees - including disabled veterans - by 20 percent. Since then, IAVA and other veterans and military groups have worked tirelessly to demand Congress reverse the cuts.
Your voice is being heard. Yesterday, the Senate overwhelmingly voted to repeal benefit cuts for anyone who joined before January 1, 2014.
This is a big deal. It means that a retired Army Sergeant First Class (E-7) won’t have to lose $83,000 in the benefits he or she was promised. It means that veterans and their families won’t have to sacrifice more than they already have had to. While this change does not protect anyone who enlists today, this is still a big deal. Rest assured that IAVA’s advocacy team will keep pushing Congress to correct the mistake they made when they voted to cut retirement benefits in December.
The truth is that Congress should have never put our veterans in this position in the first place. Veterans and their families aren't Congress' piggy bank and they cannot balance the budget on the back of our community.
Just because this battle is over doesn’t mean the war is won. IAVA fights every single day for veterans and we can’t do it alone.
We continue to need your help. Click here to give $5 today and we can fight even harder tomorrow.
-- Tom
Tom Tarantino
Chief Policy Officer, IAVA
Web: | http://americancoldwarvets.org/ |
Blog: | Cold War Veterans Blog |
Email: | Sean.Eagan@gmail.com |
Phone: | 716 720-4000 |
Network: | My Fast Pitch! Profile |
Web: | http://americancoldwarvets.org/ |
Blog: | Cold War Veterans Blog |
Email: | Sean.Eagan@gmail.com |
Phone: | 716 720-4000 |
Network: | My Fast Pitch! Profile |
Proposal by Rep. Jeff Miller would make firing failing Veterans Affairs bosses easier
BY MARK FLATTEN
The Washington Examiner
FEBRUARY 11, 2014
Top career civil service executives at the Department of Veterans Affairs could be fired more easily for failing to deliver quality medical care to patients or timely decisions on disability benefits, under legislation proposed by the chairman of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs.
Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., said he introduced the measure Tuesday to bring accountability that is lacking in the agency, which more often rewards failure with bonuses than punishes it with terminations.
“VA’s widespread and systemic lack of accountability is exacerbating all of its most pressing problems,” Miller said.
“The department’s well-documented reluctance to ensure its leaders are held accountable for mistakes is tarnishing the reputation of the organization and may actually be encouraging more veteran suffering instead of preventing it,” Miller said.
“With all the problems VA hospitals and regional offices have recently had and new issues continually arising, we need to give the VA secretary the authority he needs to fix things. That’s what my bill would do.”
Miller’s bill would strip top administrators in the Senior Executive Service at the veterans’ agency of a variety of notification and appeal rights that currently apply government-wide. Under Miller's bill, the VA secretary’s decision would be final.
The Miller proposal specifies the same rules that apply to congressional staffers, who are considered at-will employees who can be fired without traditional merit-system protections, would apply to SES employees at VA.
The bill would not affect those in the lower-ranking General Schedule classifications or other agencies. VA had 448 SES executives in fiscal 2012. The agency has about 330,000 employees.
A companion bill was introduced in the Senate by Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.
Miller has been pressuring VA Secretary Eric Shinseki to explain why SES-level workers have not been disciplined despite a recent string of preventable patient deaths in VA facilities and a backlog of disability benefits claims affecting more than 400,000 veterans.
At least 21 preventable patient deaths have been documented in recent years by the VA's inspector general or acknowledged by the agency at hospitals in South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Tennessee.
Internal VA documents obtained by congressional investigators show evidence 10 additional preventable deaths, details of which have not been disclosed.
While some top VA executives have retired, none has been publicly fired.
Most notable is the November 2013 retirement of Michael Moreland, who had been regional director in charge of an area that includes hospitals in Pittsburgh.
At least five patients died of Legionnaires' disease linked to improper maintenance and mismanagement at VA medical facilities there.
Moreland received a Presidential Rank Award bonus of almost $63,000 last year.
Shinseki said in a Jan. 31 letter to Miller that he already has the power to hold his people accountable for poor performance.
“I believe VA has sufficient authority to take swift action to hold employees and executives accountable for performance,” Shinseki said.
“One of the goals of the Senior Executive Service is to ensure accountability for efficient and effective government. This is achieved by holding senior executives accountable for their individual and organizational performance through a rigorous performance appraisal program,” he said.
Shinseki also defended the bonuses paid to top executives as necessary “to attract and retain the best leaders.”
Earlier this month, a bill to ban performance bonuses to SES-level employees at VA through the 2018 fiscal year unanimously passed the House.
###
Curt Cashour
House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
Web: | http://americancoldwarvets.org/ |
Blog: | Cold War Veterans Blog |
Email: | Sean.Eagan@gmail.com |
Phone: | 716 720-4000 |
Network: | My Fast Pitch! Profile |
In anticipation of our upcoming Mid-Winter Conference, we have posted Talking Points to our website. They can be accessed here.
The talking points will be available at the Mid-Winter Conference. For those of you who will not be in attendance, you are encouraged to print the talking points and take them with you to meetings with your elected officials during the Mid-Winter Conference and beyond.
As always, thank you for your commitment to America's ill and injured veterans and their families and survivors.
Insert your main body content here. You can add text, links, and formatting to your message here.This section should contain your lead article. Keep your content body short and concise.
If possible, try to use:
- Bulleted lists as they help your readers find relevant information
- This is an example of a bulleted list
Lastly, don't forget to ask your subscribers to take action on your issue and subscribe to your mailing list.
If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here.
Web: | http://americancoldwarvets.org/ |
Blog: | Cold War Veterans Blog |
Email: | Sean.Eagan@gmail.com |
Phone: | 716 720-4000 |
Network: | My Fast Pitch! Profile |